Berlin 9 November 1989 – the Wall Loses its Relevance
Extract ConfidentialBonn, 14 November 1989
[…]
2
Report
“Ab sofort” was the answer of the SEDSozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands (Socialist Unity Party of Germany) Politburo member responsible for information,
SchabowskiGünter Schabowski
member of the
SEDSozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands (Socialist Unity Party of Germany) Politburo and spokesman of the
GDRGerman Democratic Republic government 1989.
, after the meeting of
the Central Committee on the 9th on the question when the arrangement for
travel to the Federal Republic and West Berlin that he had just made public would
enter into force. A directive that he presumed was already known to the assembled
press, but which he himself clearly did not know intimately. The border guards were
also unprepared, but confronted by the inflowing masses they threw open the gates at
the Borholmer Strasse crossing, stepped back and let the flow of people pass by.
Shortly afterwards the other border crossings followed including Checkpoint Charlie.
The Wall had – in the words of governing mayor MomperWalter Momper
Governing Mayor of West Berlin 16.2.1989–24.1.1991.
– lost its relevance.
On 9 November 1989, this inhuman and monstrous edifice that was founded on 13 August
1961 fell. The cornered leadership of the collapsing “First State of Workers and
Farmers on German Soil”3 had risked the desperate
flight forward to stem the bloodletting of “Republikflucht”4 and regain the trust of the population.
In Berlin (West) this “Day of Re-Encounter”5 (Momper) led to an emotionally
charged cheerfully chaotic exuberant weekend in which nearly two million people from
the Eastern Sector and all parts of the GDRGerman Democratic Republic flowed into the city. Many with tears in
their eyes, hand in hand, elderly, young people, families with children, toddlers and
babies (one was even born here), they came in their small two-stroke cars or on foot
in a ceaseless flow of people. Some came to reunite with relatives, others for a
specific purpose “having my car repaired and taking a beer” – as one of them told me
– to shop, but most of them came to establish in person that the incredible had
become true and see the forbidden land. Only a few, about 5000, mostly immediate
family members of previous refugees, decided to stay. This incredible coming and
going led to enormous traffic chaos both in the East at the few border crossings,
where most left their cars to cross on foot, and in the West, where the public
transport system could barely handle the flow, despite deploying all available
resources. The GDRGerman Democratic Republic quickly opened new crossings, one of them located on the
historically significant Potsdammer Platz in the middle of the “Todesstreifen”6 on the 12th. In about three hours’ time, some
15,000 flower bouquets from the Netherlands were handed out to welcome those from the
East at the initiative of the flower trade fair Aalsmeer. It was a gesture witnessed
by Federal President WeizsäckerRichard von Weizsäcker
President of the
FRGFederal Republic of Germany 1.7.1984 –30.6.1994.
and governing mayor Momper.
The western part of the city responded openly, warmly and enthusiastically. The first
people to arrive were showered with champagne and many were welcomed as guests in the
house. Special arrangements for the quick payment of the so-called “Begrüssungsgeld”
(DMDeutsche Mark 100 per year per person), special offers of coveted goods in stores (sometimes
acceptance of parity between the DMDeutsche Mark and GDRGerman Democratic Republic currency), free concerts and
performances, etc. etc. The event, however, focused on the Kurfürstendamm, where
visitors flocked to witness the big unknown of capitalist consumption economics with
their own eyes. Here a true people’s party of fraternization developed. Striking was
the festive but very disciplined and controlled atmosphere.
Below are some points of special significance:
a. Reunification
A false note was introduced into the festivities by the politicians, namely the CDUChristlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (Christian Democratic Union of Germany)
and Federal Chancellor KohlHelmut Kohl
Chancellor of the
FRGFederal Republic of Germany 1.10.1982–27.10.1998.
, who could not refrain from emphasizing this theme.
This was expressed on the one hand in a sharp disagreement at the Special Session of
the Berlin House of Deputies on 10 November in the presence of the Federal Chancellor
and the SPDSozialdemokratische Partei Deutschland (Social Democratic Party of Germany) honorary chairman BrandtWilly Brandt
Governing Mayor of West Berlin 3.10.1957–1.12.1966 and Chancellor of the
FRGFederal Republic of Germany 22.10.1969–7.5.1974.
and Minister GenscherHans-Dietrich Genscher
Vice-Chancellor and Minister for Foreign Affairs of the
FRGFederal Republic of Germany 1.10.1982–17.5.1992.
when the CDUChristlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (Christian Democratic Union of Germany) and the SPDSozialdemokratische Partei Deutschland (Social Democratic Party of Germany) (the latter under
pressure from their coalition partner the ALAlternative Liste für Umweltschutz (Alternative List for environmental protection)) could not agree to the text of a joint
statement (text by telex). SPDSozialdemokratische Partei Deutschland (Social Democratic Party of Germany)/ALAlternative Liste für Umweltschutz (Alternative List for environmental protection) could not go beyond “The House of Representatives
of Berlin firmly adheres to the goal of working towards a state of peace and the
unity of Europe, in which the German people are also free to determine their
coexistence, on which it decides by exercising its right of
self-determination”7. While the CDUChristlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (Christian Democratic Union of Germany) insisted on the words “can achieve
its unity”8 instead of the phrase in italics. Therefore the
final text was adopted with only the votes of the SPDSozialdemokratische Partei Deutschland (Social Democratic Party of Germany)/ALAlternative Liste für Umweltschutz (Alternative List for environmental protection).
It was painful that the Chancellor was afterwards whistled at by many of the
thousands who were present, but a significant indication of the prevailing mood was
that in his speech he later reproached ruling mayor Momper as having spoken of “the
people of the GDRGerman Democratic Republic”, which led to a sharp exchange of words.
The appeal made by the Berlin CDUChristlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (Christian Democratic Union of Germany) leader DiepgenEberhard Diepgen
Mayor of West Berlin, 1984–16.3.1989.
, who also called for the GDRGerman Democratic Republic to break down the
Wall and open the Brandenburg Gate was a false note.
The visitors and the West Berlin population, did not appear to support this theme.
For them it was a meeting, an association and a rediscovery. The rest could wait.
b. Brandenburg Gate
The only incident of significance occurred on this historic spot. A clear separation
here is symbolic for both the political and international legal identity of the GDRGerman Democratic Republic.
The GDRGerman Democratic Republic decision is limited to the broadening of the travel options for its own
citizens to the Federal Republic and Berlin (West) and possibly other states. The
national border of the independent nation of the GDRGerman Democratic Republic will therefore remain
unaffected. Attempts by Berlin’s youths to pull down segments of the Wall and occupy
the outer Wall at the Brandenburg Gate in the evening hours of 10 November were, from
this perspective, border crossings. The GDRGerman Democratic Republic responded very cautiously and in a
controlled manner. The water cannon gave the young people wet suits but was effective
and afterwards posting a detachment of unarmed border troops on the Wall
sufficed.
An agreement with the West Berlin police that included a promise that it would
counter further disturbances made even this redundant.
c. Cooperation
The situation that arose as a result of the GDRGerman Democratic Republic decree forced the government and
public services of both districts to contact and cooperation that was unheard of and
which ran counter to many existing regulations. Most characteristic was the joint
inauguration of the Potsdamer Platz crossing by reigning mayor Momper and
Oberbürgermeister KrackErhard Krack
Mayor of East Berlin 11.2.1974–15.2.1990.
on the morning of 12 November. In their official
capacities, they had never previously had any contact with each other. Afterwards,
Federal President von Weizsäcker had a conversation with GDRGerman Democratic Republic border troops on GDRGerman Democratic Republic
territory.
The nature of the discussion was pragmatic, the goal an undisturbed and smooth flow
of visitor traffic. From the GDRGerman Democratic Republic side, breaches were made, stations opened and the
West Berlin police, fire brigade and public transport took care of the removal of
watchtowers, traffic safety and lines and public transport from the new crossings
(sometimes even on GDRGerman Democratic Republic territory where for example a West Berlin bus service was
extended to Potsdam). An emergency telephone connection between the two police
headquarters and contact at the highest level has now become a fact while on the work
floor at the crossings the GDRGerman Democratic Republic border soldier and the West Berlin policeman stand
side by side, beaming enthusiastically.
d. The Future
The euphoria will soon fade and then the question will arise how to proceed. From the
GDRGerman Democratic Republic side the assurance has now been given that all this will not be reversed or
adjusted in a limiting sense of the word. However, things, in particular the
“non-bureaucratic” conduct of affairs, will have to be replaced by a more regular
settlement. This means a continuous flow of visitors who will come to do their
shopping here and maybe find employment.
More serious is the danger of illegal exports of scarce GDRGerman Democratic Republic consumer goods for
illegal trade in Berlin (West). Since a cross-country skiing boot is available over
there for 49 GDRGerman Democratic Republic mark and the unofficial exchange rate is 1 DMDeutsche Mark for 10 GDRGerman Democratic Republic marks
(official parity) this will speak for itself. The ominous word monetary reform, to
prevent the “Clearance sale of the GDRGerman Democratic Republic”9 has already been used over there and
seems to be a compelling first step towards economic sanitation. Meanwhile interim
arrangements and agreements will be required. Here too, intensive cooperation between
Senate and GDRGerman Democratic Republic authorities will be necessary.
Given that it is not to be expected that the GDRGerman Democratic Republic state and (party) leadership will
accept that the Soviets will resume their formal role as occupying forces, and in
fact the Soviet Union will certainly not be willing to do so, the Allies are now
facing a more difficult reconsideration. In some respects they have been passed on
the left hand side by developments and can do little else than accept that they too
are spectators at events in which they play no role. The situation at Check Point
Charlie during the weekend was significant. Between the crowd of West Berliners who
rejoiced in welcoming their East German countrymen and fellow city inhabitants, an
American, a French and a British military policeman appeared lost in observing the
formalities of painstakingly checking returning compatriots (military or civil).